Appoint Corporate Attorney in Pakistan:
To appoint attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore you may contact Jamila Law Associates. Given section 85 of the Evidence Act, 1872, the Court has to presume that it was executed and authenticated. Once the original document is produced to be a power-of-attorney so executed and attested as mentioned was executed and authenticated. The provision is mandatory through attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore.
The Court can presume that all the requirements for the proper execution of the power-of-attorney have been duly fulfilled but once the power-of-attorney on its face shows to have been executed before, and authenticated by, a Notary Public, the Court has to presume so that it was so executed and authenticated. The attestation by a Notary Public of a document was purporting to be a power-of-attorney. The object of this section is to avoid the necessity of such an affidavit of identity under the Evidence Act, 1872; the Courts have to take judicial notice of Notaries Public's seals.
When the seal is already there, of which judicial notice is taken, there is no reason why it should not take judicial notice of the signature through attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore. What is argued by the learned counsel for the defendants 1 to 3 is that the word Notary Public in section 85 and section 57 of the Evidence Act, 1872 merely means notaries appointed under it should not take judicial notice that where a document purports to be a power-of-attorney before the Court can presume it to be so executed and authenticated as is contemplated by section 85, it should have been authenticated by an Indian Counsel or Vice-Counsel The Supreme Court illustrates that Notaries Public of foreign countries has been recognized as proper authorities for due execution and authentication for section 85 of the Evidence Act in Jugraj Singh v. Jaswant Singh.
The Supreme Court through attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore held that a power-of-attorney executed and authenticated before a Notary Public of California satisfied the test of section 85 of the Evidence Act, 1872. Surely section 87 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 forbids the Courts to take judicial notice of Notary Public's seals. The authentication made by the Notary Public in New York covered two printed pages of the Report and quoted extensively the circumstances in which the general power-of-attorney was executed Electric Construction and Equipment Co. Ltd. v. Jagjit Electric Works Sirsa, is one decision. Where there was a consideration in the extension of the authentication by a notary by the Delhi High Court Section 85 of the Evidence Act, according to the Court, raises a presumption about the execution of a power-of-attorney provided two conditions are satisfied. It must execute it before the Notary Public, and second, it must be authenticated by a Notary Public. In the present case, there was no authentication at all through attorney in Pakistan or corporate lawyers in Lahore. There was no statement of facts by the Notary Public regarding the manner of execution or the persons executing the document.